CSPA

 

Russian River

Jim D. Nelson, Applicant Application Nos. 29525 and 29526


Subject:

Russian River Again - Steelhead and Coho Salmon

Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:24:15 +0000

From: BOB BAIOCCHI <cspa@psln.com>

Organization: CSPA

To: CSPA Board of Directors via email

 

 

State of California

 

Before the State Water Resources Control Board

 

 

Jim D. Nelson, Applicant

 

Application Nos. 29525 and 29526

 

Applications to Appropriate Water

 

Russian River Watershed thence Pacific Ocean

 

Public Trust Protest

by the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

 

 

We have reviewed the Division of Water Right's public notice of March

27, 1998 regarding Applications 29525 and 29526. We reference the public

notice of March 27, 1998.

 

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

 

Applications 29525 and 29526

 

We have reviewed the description of the project in the Division's

notice of March 27, 1998. The applicant proposes to pump water directly

from the Russian River for vineyard operation.

 

Under Application 29525, a total of 5.6 acre-feet of water pumped at

varying rates, will be diverted during the month of June for irrigation

and heat control purposes. The amount of water applied for is 0.31 cfs

for irrigation and 1.63 cfs for heat control. Under Application 29526,

an additional 24.7 acre-feet of water will be pumped at a rate of 2.9

cfs for frost protection. The applicant has requested to divert water

from March 1 to May 15.

 

CSPA PUBLIC TRUST PROTEST

 

This protest is based on environmental grounds. The coho salmon and

steelhead trout of the Russian River and its tributaries have been

adversely impacted by diversions of the state's water. There are about

86 water right applications pending before the State Water Board to

appropriate water from the Russian River Watershed. There are about

1,326 permitted water rights on the Russian River Watershed. There are

also 247 riparian and/or pre-1914 diverters in the Russian River

Watershed.

 

 

 

 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND REASONS FOR PUBLIC TRUST PROTEST

 

 

1. The Russian River Watershed sustains Coho salmon and their habitat.

Russian River Coho salmon have been listed by the U.S. National Marine

Fisheries Service as threatened under the protection and provisions of

the federal Endangered Species Act.

 

The applicant and the Division of Water Rights should consult with the

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service to determine the direct,

indirect, and cumulative effects to Coho salmon and their habitat in the

Russian River watershed resulting from these applications, other pending

water right applications, including existing water right permits and

licenses. The recommendations from the U.S. National Marine Fisheries

Service should be incorporated into the terms and conditions of the

permits for Applications 29525 and 29526, if the permits are approved by

the SWRCB.

 

2. The proposed permits should contain mandatory daily streamflow

requirements below the point of diversion under Applications 29525 and

29526 to protect Coho salmon, aquatic resources, fish species, and other

beneficial uses of the state's water pursuant to Section 782, California

Code of Regulations, Title 23, and other applicable statues and

regulations.

 

3. The Russian River Watershed sustains steelhead trout and their

habitat. Russian River steelhead trout have been listed by the U.S.

National Marine Fisheries Service as threatened under the protection and

provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act.

 

The applicant and the Division of Water Rights should consult with the

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service to determine the direct,

indirect, and cumulative effects to steelhead trout and their habitat in

the Russian River watershed resulting from these applications, other

pending water right applications, including existing water right permits

and licenses. The recommendations from the U.S. National Marine

Fisheries Service should be incorporated into the terms and conditions

of the permits for Applications 29525 and 29526, if the permits are

approved by the SWRCB.

 

4. The proposed permits should contain mandatory daily streamflow

requirements below the point of diversion under Application 29525 and

29526 to protect steelhead trout, aquatic resources, fish species, and

other beneficial uses of the state's water pursuant to Section 782,

California Code of Regulations, Title 23, and other applicable statues

and regulations.

5. Water quality in the Russian River to be affected by the proposed

project should be sufficient below the point of diversion under

Applications 29525 and 29526 to maintain and keep in good condition at

all times Coho salmon and steelhead trout (all life stages), and aquatic

resources in the Russian River pursuant to state and federal water

quality statutes and regulations.

 

6. Should the applications be approved by the SWRCB, the diversion of

the state's water of the Russian River watershed by the applicant should

be limited from December 15 to March 31. No diversion of the state's

water under Applications 29525 and 29526 should be allowed during dry,

and critical dry water years to protect Coho salmon and steehead trout

habitat in the Russian River unless expressly approved by the U.S.

National Marine Fisheries Service.

 

7. The applicant should be required by the SWRCB to install and maintain

a measuring device which measures the amount of water bypassed below the

point of diversion in the Russian River, and also measure the amount of

water pumped for use to ensure compliance.

 

8. Water diversions in the Russian River watershed are highly

controversial among the public. Consequently, these applications should

be treated accordingly.

 

The CSPA Public Trust Protest is Based on the Following:

 

9. The CSPA public trust protest is based on: (a) Common Law Public

Trust Doctrine; (b) California Water Code; (c) Article X, Section 2 of

the California Constitution; (d) California Environmental Quality Act

and its Guidelines; (e) federal Clean Water Act; (f) federal Endangered

Species Act; and (g) state laws and regulations.

Under what conditions may this public trust protest be disregarded and

dismissed?

 

1. None at this time, subject to the above mentioned conditions, in

which are agreeable to the CSPA.

 

2. Before the protest is dismissed, provide me with a copy of the draft

CEQA document for our review and comment.

 

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Respectfully Submitted

 

 

 

 

________________________________________________

Robert J. Baiocchi, Consultant

For: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

P.O. Box 357

Quincy, CA 95971

Bus Tel: 916-836-1115 - Fax: 916-836-2062

e-mail cspa@psln.com

 

April 5, 1998

 

cc: Andy Chu, Application Unit

Division of Water Rights

P.O. Box 2000

Sacramento, CA 95812-2000

 

Jim D. Nelson, Applicant

7321 South Highway 101

Ukiah, CA 95482

 

Jim Bybee, Supervisor

Chris Mobley, Fisheries Biologist

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service

777 Sonoma Avenue

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

 

Mike Sherwood, Esquire

Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1725

San Francisco, CA 94104-4209

 

Interested Parties


 

For further information contact Bob Baiocchi at either 530-836-1115 or

at e-mail address: cspa@psln.com