CSPA

Subject: The Merced River

Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 10:29:29 +0000

From: BOB BAIOCCHI <cspa@psln.com>

Organization: CSPA

To: CSPA board, via email

 

 

 

Ms. Carol L. Sampson, Director March 13, 1998

Office of Hydropower Licensing

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20426

 

Mr. Wayne White, State Supervisor

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 130

Sacramento, CA 95821-6340

 

Mr. James Lecky, Chief

Protected Species

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service

501 West Ocean Blvd. Suite 4200

Long Beach, CA 90802-4213

 

Mr. George Nokes, Regional Manager

California Department of Fish and Game

1234 East Shaw Avenue

Fresno, CA 93710

 

Mr. Jim Canaday, CWA 401 Coordinator

California State Water Resources Control Board

Division of Water Rights

P.O. Box 2000

Sacramento, CA 95812-2000

 

Re: Merced River, Tributary to San Joaquin River thence San Francisco

Bay Delta Estuary; New Exchequer Project; FERC Project No. 2179-024;

Merced Irrigation District; Federal Energy Regulatory Intervention of

February 17, 1998; Request for Formal Actions by State and Federal

Agencies by the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

 

Dear Ms. Sampson, Mr. White, Mr. Lecky, Mr. Nokes, and Mr. Canaday:

 

Please find enclosed a letter dated February 17, 1998, from the Office

of Hydropower Licensing of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

directed to the Merced Irrigation District regarding FERC Project No.

2179-024. See enclosure.

 

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission advised the CSPA and the

Merced Irrigation District that the license for FERC Project 2179 has a

re-opener condition set forth. As stated by the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, "Article 10 of the project license includes

provisions to re-open the license for the purpose of altering project

structures and operation for the conservation and development of fish

and wildlife resources, after notice and opportunity for hearing".

 

The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance believes that

re-opening the license for the project and modification of the project

operation is timely to protect and restore the anadromous fisheries of

the Merced River as shown below.

 

On April 14, 1995, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

requested the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to re-open the

license for the project for the purpose of modifying the project

operation for the protection and restoration of the anadromous fisheries

of the Merced River affected by the operation of the project. The CSPA

requested the Commission require changes in the minimum flow

requirements at the project for the protection and enhancement of

anadromous salmonids in the Merced River.

 

The California Sportfishing Protection Alliance is formally requesting

the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. National Marine Fisheries

Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and the California

State Water Resources Control Board to formally engage the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission process in the matter of modifying the

subject project and mitigating adverse impacts to anadromous fish and

other public trust resources of the Merced River resulting from the

operation of the project.

 

The Merced River did sustain spring-run chinook salmon species and

their habitat. Spring-run chinook salmon species of the Merced River,

and also of the San Joaquin River Watershed, were extinguished because

of the dams and the failure of the federal and state regulatory agencies

to protect this species. New Exchequer Dam, the project dam, was one of

those dams. The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service is proposing

within a year whether to list spring-run chinook salmon of the Central

Valley under the protection of the provisions of the federal Endangered

Species Act.

 

The Merced River sustains fall-run chinook salmon species and their

habitat. The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service within a year is

proposing whether to list fall-run and late fall-run chinook salmon of

the Central Valley Region under the protection of the provisions of the

federal Endangered Species Act.

 

The Merced River did sustain steelhead trout species, and river should

still sustain steelhead trout species. The Merced River sustains other

fish and aquatic species and their habitat. The U.S. National Marine

Fisheries Service should shortly list steelhead trout species of the

Central Valley Region under the protection of the provisions of the

federal Endangered Species Act.

 

The U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service has a duty and a

responsibility to protect species protected under the federal Endangered

Species Act.

 

The Merced River Watershed most likely sustains other species protected

under the provisions of the federal Endangered Species Act. The U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service has a duty and responsibility to protect

species protected under the federal Endangered Species Act. The U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service also has a duty and a responsibility to engage

federally licensed projects that affect fish and wildlife resources.

 

The California Department of Fish and Game is a responsible state fish

and wildlife trustee agency. Pursuant to California Fish and Game Code

702, the California Department of Fish and Game is compelled to require

dam owners to release sufficient amount of water at all times to keep

fish in good condition below the dam.

 

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in their letter of February

17, 1998 advised the CSPA that the California Department of Fish and

Game was negotiating with the Merced Irrigation District concerning

negotiations that may affect releases of water and anadromous fisheries

at the project. The CSPA has not received any information from the

California Department of Fish and Game regarding the ongoing

negotiations, nor has the CSPA received any information from the Merced

Irrigation District, the licensee.

 

The California State Water Resources Control Board has Section 401 of

the federal Clean Water Act authority to regulate the beneficial uses of

the state's water at and below New Exchequer Dam, the project dam. The

Merced Irrigation District also has water right permits and/or licenses

to operation the project for power purposes and other consumptive uses.

 

Some of the major problems associated with the operation of the project

are as follows: (a)inadequate mandatory daily minimum riverflow

requirements for salmonids (all life stages) and other cold water

species below New Exchequer Dam, and also below other points of

diversions during all water year types; (b) potential unsuitable water

temperatures for all life stages of salmonids below New Exchequer Dam

and also below other points of diversion during all water year types;

(c) fish passage obstruction for salmonids at all existing diversion

dams and barriers; (d) inadequate attraction flows for adult anadromous

fish species during all water year types; (e) inadequate downstream

migration flows for juvenile anadromous fish species during all water

year types; (f) unscreened diversions causing harm and injury to all

life stages of anadromous fish; (g) fluctuating flows causing harm and

damage to redds and juvenile salmonids; (h) replenishing spawning

gravels affected by the natural downstream recruitment by New Exchequer

Dam and other diversions dams (i) potential water quality problems; (j)

improvement of watershed management to restore and protect instream and

riparian habitat; and (k) others not mentioned.

 

Recommendations by the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

 

The CSPA is requesting the following actions:

 

1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) should re-open

the license for FERC Project 2179 in cooperation with the above

mentioned state and federal agencies and modify the operations of the

project to restore, protect, and enhance anadromous salmonids in the

Merced River, including other public trust resources;

 

2. The Commission should modify the existing mandatory daily minimum

flow requirements below New Exchequer Dam, and also below other

diversions, to restore, protect, and enhance salmonids (all life stages)

and other public trust resources;

 

3. The Commission should require attraction flows from New Exchequer Dam

to the San Joaquin River for adult salmonids migration;

 

4. The Commission should require migration flows from New Exchequer Dam

to the San Joaquin River for juvenile salmonids migration;

 

5. The Commission should require the licensee to maintain adequate daily

water temperatures below New Exchequer Dam and below other points of

diversion that protect cold water fish species such as salmonids, and

also aquatic species;

 

6. The Commission should require the licensee to construct and maintain

state of the art fish screens at all diversions to protect salmonids and

other fish species from harm and injury;

 

7. The Commission should require the licensee to cease fluctuating flows

resulting from project operation to protect and enhance salmonids (all

life stages);

 

8. The Commission should require the licensee to replenish spawning

gravel annually for all salmonid species below New Exchequer Dam to the

San Joaquin River;

 

9. The Commission should require the licensee to reintroduce and restore

spring-run chinook salmon species and their habitat in the Merced River;

 

10. The Commission should require the licensee to implement protection

measures to protect water quality and the beneficial uses of the state's

water in the Merced River resulting from the operation of the project;

 

11. The Commission should require the licensee to consult with the U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service

regarding the "taking" of species protected under the provisions of the

federal Endangered Species Act;

 

12. Any and all agreements between the licensee and the California

Department of Fish and Game must be in full compliance with the

California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental

Policy Act, including all applicable provisions of state and federal law

such as the federal U.S. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Federal

Power Act, federal Clean Water Act, federal Endangered Species Act,

Public Trust Doctrine, Caifornia Fish and Game Code 5937, and the

California Water Code.

 

If there are any questions, I can be reached at my office at

530-836-1115. My fax is 530-836-2062.

 

 

 

Respectfully Submitted

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________

Robert J. Baiocchi, Consultant

For: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

P.O. Box 357

Quincy, CA 95971

 

Enclosure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service List

 

Ms. Carol L. Sampson, Director

Office of Hydropower Licensing

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20426

(Original and 7 Copies)

 

Mr. Wayne White, State Supervisor

c/o Ms. Susan Boring, Biologist

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 130

Sacramento, CA 95821-6340

 

Mr. James Lecky, Chief

Protected Species

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service

501 West Ocean Blvd. Suite 4200

Long Beach, CA 90802-4213

 

Mr. George Nokes, Regional Manager

California Department of Fish and Game

1234 East Shaw Avenue

Fresno, CA 93710

 

Mr. Jim Canaday, CWA 401 Coordinator

California State Water Resources Control Board

Division of Water Rights

P.O. Box 2000

Sacramento, CA 95812-2000

 

Mr. Jim Bybee, Supervisor

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service

777 Sonoma Avenue

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

 

Mr. Chris Mobley, Fisheries Biologist

U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service

777 Sonoma Avenue

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

 

Mr. Jim Crenshaw, President

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

1248 East Oak Avenue, Suite D

Woodland, CA 95695

 

Mr. Steve Volker, Esquire

Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1725

San Francisco, CA 94104-4209

 

 

 

Mr. Ross Rogers

Merced Irrigation District, Licensee

P.O. Box 2288

Merced, California 95344-0288

 

Interested Parties