CSPA
Conservation Alert Feather River Hatchery
Subject: Feather River Fish Hatchery Expansion
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 16:04:02 +0000
From: Bob Baiocchi <cspa@psln.com>
Organization: CSPA
To: Distribution
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
CONSERVATION ALERT
We Won the War, But Lost the Battle
Feather River Fish Hatchery Expansion
The CSPA, Lake Oroville Fish Enhancement Committee (LOFEC), and the
Butte County Citizens for Fair Government worked overtime during the
past three years in having the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) order the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to
expansion the Feather River Fish Hatchery. Recently, the FERC ruled on
the expansion of the Feather River Fish Hatchery. Though the DWR did not
want to expand the hatchery initially, FERC ordered DWR to expand the
hatchery.
We won the war over the expansion of the hatchery. However, we lost the
battle over the size of the expanded hatchery. The CSPA, LOFEC, and
BCCFG recommended 1600 feet of raceway at the expanded hatchery. That
recommendation was consistent with what the California Department of
Fish and Game (DFG) was supporting in the early 1990's for the defacto
endangered spring-run chinook salmon. The DFG walked away from
supporting the 1600 feet of new raceway for the spring-run, and jumped
in bed with DWR. The FERC ordered 600 feet of raceway at the expanded
hatchery, and also 600 feet of raceway at the existing hatchery to rear
surplus fall-run chinook salmon to be planted into Oroville Reservoir
for sportfishing purposes. However, in the FERC Order, FERC stated that
nothing precluded the expansion of the expanded hatchery in the future.
The Feather River Fish Hatchery was ordered by FERC to mitigate for the
loss of steelhead and chinook salmon habitat above Oroville Dam.
Oroville Reservoir contains 3.5 million acre-feet of water at full
capacity. To date DWR has not mitigated for the pre-project spring-run
chinook salmon populations. And DFG has been planting surplus fall-run
chinook salmon reared at the Hatchery at other reservoirs in the state.
Also, DWR has refused to re-construct a fish ladder at the Big Bend Dam
on the North Fork Feather River. DFG also supported the DWR position.
against reconstructing the fish ladder. Big Bend Dam prevents the
upstream migration of fish in the reservoir to spawn in a river
environment. The CSPA and LOFEC recommended DWR re-construct the fish
ladder.
The ongoing battle between CSPA, LOFEC, and DWR, is the number of
chinook salmon and brown trout to be planted in the reservoir following
the conclusion of the FERC ordered five (5) year fishery study. The five
year fishery study of the reservoir was ordered by FERC because of the
CSPA and LOFEC's motion to intervene with FERC concerning DWR's proposed
recreational changes in their recreation plan for the Oroville Project.
DWR attempted to walk away from recreational improvements that it
promised to the people in Butte County when DWR constructed the Oroville
Project. But, FERC ordered the formation of the Oroville Recreation
Advisory Committee (ORAC) which have successfully promoted million of
dollars of recreational improvements at the Oroville Project.
It is clear to the CSPA that DWR does not serve the public nor promote
environmental protection, but serves the State Water Contractors with
water from the Oroville Project, and also from the Bay Delta Estuary
regardless of the effects to the environment. And its also clear that
DFG cannot be trusted in protecting the state's fisheries, and promoting
the needs of the anglers who pay their salaries.
The CSPA, LOFEC, and BCCFG will be working overtime in the development
of an outstanding cold water sportfishery at Oroville Reservoir. Too bad
we do not have the support of DWR and DFG.
For further information contact Bob Baiocchi at either 530-836-1115 or
at e-mail address: cspa@psln.com